From 491751b551f2af13fbad469b381491f8bd179522 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Vladim=C3=ADr=20Vondru=C5=A1?= <mosra@centrum.cz>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 03:09:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Trade: yup, it was libc++.

Not sure, but maybe calling `compare(a, a)` inside `std::sort()` isn't
the best plan for having the sorting done fast??
---
 src/Magnum/Trade/MaterialData.cpp | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/Magnum/Trade/MaterialData.cpp b/src/Magnum/Trade/MaterialData.cpp
index 9b37d8015..77e8135f4 100644
--- a/src/Magnum/Trade/MaterialData.cpp
+++ b/src/Magnum/Trade/MaterialData.cpp
@@ -238,7 +238,8 @@ MaterialData::MaterialData(const MaterialTypes types, Containers::Array<Material
                    Additionally an *extra paranoid* check for shitty STL
                    implementations that might call this comparator with both
                    arguments the same (in which case the assert would fire,
-                   which is undesirable). */
+                   which is undesirable). Apparently libc++ is responsible for
+                   such atrocities. */
                 CORRADE_ASSERT(&a == &b || a.name() != b.name(),
                     "Trade::MaterialData: duplicate attribute" << a.name(), false);
                 return a.name() < b.name();