MSVC 2015 and 2017 is clueless when it comes to trying to deduce the
template parameters (C2893: Failed to specialize function template). It
works when calling add<V, R> explicitly, but that makes the API hard to
use and inconsistent between platforms. The only possible workaround is
to make add() take *anything*, casting it to proper TrackView type and
then calling add() with explicit template parameters. This also neatly
resolves the Track/TrackView overload, as the static_cast is either a
no-op or it invokes the conversion operator on Track. The original code
also reportedly makes the Intellisense freezing like hell and adding
this overload fixes the freezes. Three birds with one stone.
The Player class definition is now full of typedefs, with the amount of
comments about why the typedefs are there much bigger than the actual
code. Oh well.
At the moment, with the major use case, which is playing back glTF
animations, one can't use atStrict() because there Extrapolation is
specified to be always Constant. The atStrict() function behaves as
Extrapolate and one would need to patch the imported tracks to add
explicit keyframes at the beginning/end of the duration that emulate the
Constant behavior.
I managed to work around that for Emscripten 1.38.5 by adding an
explicit definition of noexcept Player::Track copy
constructor/assignment, but that didn't solve anything for Emscripten,
iOS or Android. Since I can't reproduce that on *anything* I have on
this machine and it seems that the problem somehow just goes away when
using a more recent Clang, I decided to just remove the noexcept
specifier altogether.
I had a temptation to make it noexcept everywhere except Clang, but that
might add potential portability issues (code that works with GCC would
suddenly break on Clang without any clear reason).
For consistency with all other views such as Containers::ArrayView as
these are all relatively light types and so the construction should be
lightweight as well. OTOH, Track constructors are still explicit because
they're heavy and the user should experience the heaviness firsthand.
Moreover, this will prevent from passing e.g. integer-based keys to
Trade::AnimationData. And this also now allows me to add duration() to
Trade::AnimationData. I also moved all accessors that don't need a
concrete value type to this base class.
Or via an enum + func ptr. Main goal of this is to provide a hint to
users who want to supply their own interpolator (for example with a
different perf/correctness tradeoff, or a optimized/inlined/batch
version etc.).
Will be used to supply general desired interpolation method to tracks to
make it possible for the user to decide about a particular interpolator
function for given type.
Vladimír Vondruš