The MAGNUM_GL_ABSTRACTSHADERPROGRAM_SUBCLASS_DRAW_IMPLEMENTATION() and
MAGNUM_GL_ABSTRACTSHADERPROGRAM_SUBCLASS_DISPATCH_IMPLEMENTATION() *is*
documented so that one stays not underscored.
So they can be used in StridedArrayView member function slicing the same
way as the mutable overloads. Pointer, Triple and other low-level
containers do the same thing and this is one of the prime use cases for
the slicing functionality, so it's silly it didn't actually work.
Same as done for Containers::StaticArray some time ago. Since it's not a
potentially dangerous operation, it's not made as an overload of the
from() function, but instead a regular constructor. It's however kept
explicit for now, even though it eventually might not need to be -- I'm
not sure about potential consequences yet.
This complier is making my hair gray. Fortunately the out-of-class
operator doesn't conflict with the in-class one, so it's purely an
additive workaround. Adding extra checks to all subclasses to be sure
this works correctly in all cases and not just in the base class.
Except for a vector and a row matrix multiplication operator, which
doesn't make sense to be a member. These are all now significantly
shorter thanks to not having to repeat that many template parameters,
and they can make use of direct access into the _data array for better
debug perf.
Despite what the standard tries to say. I bet a large portion of
<type_traits> is impossible to implement without it, which is why all
STL implementations define it there already.
The old one is deprecated, and will be removed in a future release.
Unfortunately, to avoid deprecation warnings, all use of NoInit in the
Math library temporarily have to be Magnum::NoInit This will be cleaned
up when the deprecated alias is removed.
The compiler does that for us. Probably a brain fart from 2010. On the
other hand, the ConfigurationValue specializations need to be there,
because the type is used explicitly as template parameter.
Useful for squeezing out last bits of performance, e.g. in this case:
Vector3 a;
a[0] = something++;
a[1] = something++;
a[2] = something++;
In the code all elements are first zeroed out and then overwritten
later, thus it might be good to avoid the zero-initialization:
Vector3 a{Math::NoInit};
a[0] = something++;
a[1] = something++;
a[2] = something++;
This will of course be more useful in far larger data types and arrays
of these.
Some classes are by default constructed zero-filled while other are set
to identity and the only way to to check this is to look into the
documentation. This changes the default constructor of all classes to
take an optional "tag" which acts as documentation about how the type is
constructed. Note that this result in no behavioral changes, just
ability to be more explicit when writing the code. Example:
// These two are equivalent
Quaternion q1;
Quaternion q2{Math::IdentityInit};
// These two are equivalent
Vector4 vec1;
Vector4 vec2{Math::ZeroInit};
Matrix4 a{Math::IdentityInit, 2}; // 2 on diagonal
Matrix4 b{Math::ZeroInit}; // all zero
This functionality was already present in some ugly form in Matrix,
Matrix3 and Matrix4 classes. It was long and ugly to write, so it is
now generalized into the new Math::IdentityInit and Math::ZeroInit tags,
the original Matrix::IdentityType, Matrix::Identity, Matrix::ZeroType
and Matrix::Zero are deprecated and will be removed in the future
release.
Math::Matrix<7, Int> m{Math::Matrix<7, Int>::Identity}; // before
Math::Matrix<7, Int> m{Math::IdentityInit}; // now