And also add a compiledPerVertexJointCount() helper which returns the
amount of components used in the primary and secondary joint IDs /
weights slots.
Co-authored-by: Squareys <squareys@googlemail.com>
Which is currently the case for any two attributes of the same name
(such as two texture coordinate sets), or bitangents and object ID used
together.
Plus extending the check for matrix attributes (such as instanced
transformation conflicting with secondary joint IDs and weights).
None of these attributes are builtin though, so the check can't be
verified at the moment.
And also documenting the behavior, for some reason the comment was
apparently not updated since the MeshData2D/MeshData3D days!
Because it somewhat confusingly may have implied that it's really
composed of 8-bit bools, and not bits. The same reasoning was used to
pick the name for Corrade's Containers::BitArray.
Backwards compatibility aliases are in place as usual, however the
internal BoolVectorConverter is now BitVectorConverter and there
unfortunately cannot be any backwards compatibility. This breaks only
GLM and Eigen integration in the magnum-integration repo, which I'm
fixing immediately. I don't expect any user code to use this internal
helper. For regular vectors maybe, for this one definitely not.
I realized those are too annoying when writing a glTF exporter which
contains a lot of switches over enums. And as further shown by the diff,
those were only inflicting additional pain in *all* switch statements,
nothing else, no other added value. And everywhere else the helpers are
the designated way to deal with those, so there's no point in having an
explicit enum value denoting start of a "custom range".
It wasn't even any convenient to have it in the enum, as the extra
effort needed for casting actually made it *exactly* the same length as
if I'd just use a separately-defined constant.
A bit unfortunate that the test needs ES3.2 and GS, but I got nothing
better right now. Not handling ObjectId yet, for that I need to
implement instancing first (so yes, GCC/Clang will still warn about an
unhandled switch case).
The templated version had the unfortunate "feature" of not being able to
figure out the type when an array view or a C array got passed to it.
That led to worse-than-ideal UX and even though it's now a bit more
verbose on the implementation side, it's the preferred solution.
The indexed binding is allowed for only some types (atomic counters,
uniforms, shader storage and transform feedback), thus we need separate
enum for that. Because the bind() function will be used far more often
than setTargetHint(), the original Target enum is now renamed to
TargetHint and the new Target enum contains (in non-deprecated build)
only three values.
For backwards compatibility, though, we need to have all original Target
values, thus the new Target enum contains also all other values from
TargetHint, but they are marked as deprecated and (at least) run-time
checked in bind() so they aren't accidentaly used for indexed binding.
Similarly there are also deprecated Target overloads of Buffer() and
setTargetHint(). It's ugly, but hopefully will suffice for now. This mess
will be removed as soon as possible in some upcoming version.
The point of this change is to allow greater flexibility and reduce
confusion.
When instanced meshes are implemented, MeshTools::interleave() can be
used for creating interleaved buffers with per-instance data and then
the call to Mesh::setCount() will be harmful and/or confusing, becuase
the user would in fact want to call Mesh::setInstanceCount() instead.
Similarly, MeshTools::compressIndices() can be used to create index
buffer for more than one mesh.
GL 4.4 has ARB_buffer_storage, which (in relatively distant future) will
mean that the current way of Buffer::setData() will be deprecated in
favor of Buffer::setStorage(), similarly as Texture::setStorage()
replaced Texture::setImage(). Thus any function which calls
Buffer::setData() internally is not future-proof.
The old MeshTools::compressIndices() and MeshTools::interleave()
overloads are marked as deprecated and will be removed in future
release.
Only one value from these two was used in the end, wasting precious
bytes. Also these two values were used to differentiate between indexed
and non-indexed mesh (instead of relying on actual index buffer being
bound), which was very confusing. This approach looks more clean. The
MeshView class is not yet updated, as the change would expose some
features that aren't possible in current implementation (base vertex
specification).
Merged Mesh::setVertexCount() and Mesh::setIndexCount() into one
Mesh::setCount(), the two original functions are now guarded aliases to
the new one, are marked as deprecated and will be removed in future
release, similarly for the getters.
In particular, if the mesh is indexed, setVertexCount() does nothing and
vertexCount() returns 0. The setIndexCount() and indexCount() do and
return the same regardless of whether the mesh is indexed or not.
Vladimír Vondruš